Ten years after the UK stumbled into a rushed referendum that polarised the nation and triggered disorder, a advisory comes from across the Irish Sea: it could happen again.
The government and voters entered unwittingly Brexit and the identical could occur with a national vote on a unified Ireland, triggering upheavals for which no one is equipped.
That conveys the caution from two prominent commentators from each side of the Irish border who have joined forces to scrutinise the pros and cons of Northern Ireland departing the UK to establish a new state with the Republic of Ireland.
Governmental Establishments Ill-Equipped
The author and columnist and The Northern Ireland editor, have found that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a possibly tense and monumental referendum.
"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that events can arise suddenly and can gather momentum very quickly," O’Toole stated. "In my opinion that the governmental framework of our region remains extremely volatile."
Released Volume Aims to Encourage Dialogue
The duo have examined the governmental, economic and cultural arguments for any structural alteration in a volume, For and Against a United Ireland, released by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.
They seek to provoke discussion on the matter with a roadshow of lectures that will take them to Westminster in the coming weeks.
"What troubles all parties, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," stated O’Toole.
"We do not want a referendum on a yes-no, ambiguous question whose implications have not been clarified because then you find yourself with an extraordinarily split population where people who have lost are resistant to defeat and the those successful don't know exactly what it is that they have won."
Constitutional Provision
Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland official should call a public vote on Irish unity if it appears likely that a majority would approve.
Nationalist parties and other nationalists say that moment is looming, and a group named Ireland’s Future has rallied support, but authorities in Dublin and London and pro-UK factions play down the likelihood, making it uncertain if and when there could be a national vote.
Absence of Substantive Discussion
Ideological statements supporting and opposing unity has hidden the lack of informed dialogue, noted McBride.
"People tend to be supportive or opposed the idea but the detailed consideration which might go beyond that to achieve it hasn't for the most part happened. A lot has gone on in academia but scarcely any government figures or activists are willing to participate even with the basics. As an example, what type of nation should be desired? Centralised? Decentralised?"
Volume's Strategy
In the publication, neither author supports unification or the existing arrangement. Both writes two essays that seek objectivity in laying out the argument for a unified Ireland and the rationale opposing it, assembling financial and social data, previous instances and structural examples.
Arguments cover flags and symbols, duties, health services, retirement funds, sovereign debt obligations and the risk of pro-UK militancy. The aim is to educate and stimulate dialogue.
"Considerable attention exists in the topic but there is still lacking a debate," said the writer. "Discussion indicates an acknowledgement of the idea that there could be valid points on either side."
Parallel Votes
A referendum in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where voters claim they prefer unity but reject paying higher taxes or adopting a different emblem to recognise unionists' British culture.
"Policymakers in Ireland does need to determine what the plan from nationalist groups is aside from just declaring: 'We desire a united Ireland and we love you'," stated the commentator.
Likelihood of Public Vote
McBride considers a referendum in his lifetime is possible and that it may take place abruptly. "You could have just a reckless or a poor or a feckless government minister who declares: 'Let's just do this and settle the matter.'"
Both pro-unification advocates and unionists have plausible, justified arguments, he stated. "Somebody will prevail in this matter and somebody will eventually lose but all factions has has important lessons to acquire from the opposing positions."
Appeal for More Extensive Discussion
Westminster must engage with the debate, urged the analyst. "This is about Britain. It's a UK matter as much as it is an Irish matter."